Highland Park Mayoral Candidates Position on Fort Sheridan

We asked the Highland Park mayoral candidates to respond to the question, “If you are elected, will you work to reverse the city council’s vote which supports the development of a golf course at Fort Sheridan? Here are their responses in full:

Nancy Rotering: 

Having visited the Fort Sheridan Forest Preserve area with numerous elementary school classes and Cub Scout groups, I am very fond and appreciative of the natural beauty and broad ecosystem that is there.  It is a treasure.

However, there is a legal obligation from the deed restriction that was put in place when the Lake County Forest Preserve District received the land from the Federal government.  Because the restriction was subject to a 5-party agreement on the use of the property, my understanding is that the Army is unlikely to change the deed restriction at the request of just one of the parties.

I know that members of the Forest Preserve District and the Fort Sheridan Task Force have spent years trying to come up with a fair and fiscally responsible way to resolve the land use issue.  The hybrid golf course appears to be a compromise which will meet the obligations of the deed restriction while maximizing the amount of open land available.

Terri Olian: 

In approaching this issue, I take into account what I have observed at meetings I have attended regarding the golf course, conversations I have had with Highland Park residents, the plethora of written comments that were submitted after the Open House in the latter part of the summer, my review of financial and legal documents, on-line and print news stories, and on-line blogs. I can say with certainty that there is no consensus from our community about what should happen with regard to the development of a golf course at Fort Sheridan, other than that I think an 18-hole course is by and large not supported, and is not a financially sound option.

The residents of Highland Park who bought homes in the Town of Fort Sheridan, knowing about the deed restriction in the transfer agreement of the land from the Army to the Forest Preserve District and fully expecting a golf course to be built there, have substantial equities on their side, particularly in light of the fact that the County got the land for nothing, despite offering to purchase it for $10 million during the initial base shutdown negotiations. On the other hand, the residents of Highland Park who want the land kept open for walking, bird watching, etc. correctly note that the property is unique and not replicable anywhere else.

I was thus eager to see if a plan could be worked out to balance these competing interests. I believe the current 9-hole proposal represents a fair compromise between the 18-hole course purchasers think they were promised and cost and environmental considerations. Therefore, I would not work at this time to reverse the Council’s vote in support of the development of a golf course at Fort Sheridan.

This said, I do not believe a 3rd course in the area is necessary.  If Lake County takes this course on, we have the flexibility to close one of the Highland Park courses (presumably the Highland Park Country Club) and make better use of that property for the benefit of Highland Park taxpayers. They, not the residents of Lake County as a whole, are my constituency.

As I do not see there being 3 golf courses in Highland Park in the long term, I am not concerned that a Lake County golf course will threaten the 2 existing golf courses in Highland Park.

As far as next steps are concerned, it makes sense to put the project out to bid with a RFP to see if there is a private firm that would build and operate the course.

I will conclude by saying that at the time the Council passed the Resolution in support of the development of a golf course, there was no community consensus against the course, and a firm belief that the principle of honoring people’s reasonable expectations of what was legally required of the County should not be lightly cast aside. Absent a clear demonstration of a consensus among our constituents, I believe our Resolution was appropriate and should stand.


One thought on “Highland Park Mayoral Candidates Position on Fort Sheridan

  1. Sonny, Sonny, Sonny………
    I know you and the troop are well intentioned and wish all lands could be open to us and all of nature….. except deer of course. I have been working the past 25 years of my life to achieve these spaces for the public. I think you might agree I have been pretty successful. Again, this was the greatest open space deal we put together. The Entire Lakefront, the ravines, and miles of trails were just one of our sustainability achievements on this property. We also had trash from entire ravines removed and restored to natural habitats and trails. Historic preservation and reuse of existing structures were also a part of the deal. Good Stuff…

    This was all achieved with a promise for the Golf Course by the County and a promise by the developer to put up 100’s of Millions of dollars to make the dream reality. At the time we made the deal, my first choice was all open space but the Army and developer refused that deal and said we can make it work with a golf course… Okay, not to hard to swallow. And there you have it. A COMMITTMENT, A DEAL……. A great and wonderful deal for all of us in Highland Park and Lake County who got the property at the cost of maintaining the Golf Course… Now, all they have to do is perform on the Committment they made to the Grantors, and now the Grantees of the Fort Sheridan Property. The County actually promised a brand new golf course but the old one they took down would have worked for now.

    As the Council has endorsed because of your efforts the size of the golf course has been cut in half. You should feel good about it and not push you point of view further because only conflict and continued polarization will occur. Please join all the rest of us in a spirit of comprimise and lets get it done and enjoy this great lakefront property instead of continuing to fight.


Oh yeah? Well tell us what you think...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s